Russian hacker groups are known worldwide for their sophisticated and far-reaching cyberattacks. These groups are often associated with state support and pursue a variety of objectives, including political manipulation, espionage, economic sabotage and disinformation. Their activities have a significant impact on global cyber security and pose a serious threat to state and private organizations.
The Russian hacker ecosystem is a complex and diverse network of actors, platforms and methods that is used for both financially motivated and state-sponsored cyber attacks. The close links between criminal actors and government agencies make this ecosystem particularly dangerous and difficult to combat. An effective defense against these threats requires a deep understanding of the structures and motivations within this ecosystem as well as international cooperation and robust cybersecurity measures.
Russian key players
- Fancy Bear (APT28):
Fancy Bear, also known as APT28 or Sofacy, is often associated with the Russian military intelligence service GRU. This group is known for its attacks on political institutions, media and military organizations. Fancy Bear uses a variety of techniques, including phishing, zero-day exploits and customized malware. - Cozy Bear (APT29):
Cozy Bear, also known as APT29 or The Dukes, is often attributed to the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR). This group is known for its espionage activities and has repeatedly attacked government agencies, think tanks and international organizations. Cozy Bear uses sophisticated and hidden malware to remain undetected and gather information over the long term. - Sandworm Team:
Sandworm, also known as Unit 74455, is another group associated with the GRU. This group is notorious for its destructive attacks, such as the BlackEnergy malware attack on the Ukrainian power grid and the NotPetya ransomware attack that caused significant damage worldwide. - Gamaredon:
This group, associated with the FSB, is known for its targeted phishing campaigns and espionage attacks, particularly against Ukrainian institutions. Gamaredon uses simple but effective techniques to gain access to networks and steal information.
At a glance: The Russian hacker ecosystem
The Russian cybercrime ecosystem is one of the most complex and dynamic in the world. It includes a variety of actors, platforms and methods that are used for both financially motivated cybercrime and state-sponsored cyberattacks. The close links between cybercriminals and government agencies make this ecosystem particularly dangerous.
Key players and platforms
- APT groups: The most well-known Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups include “Fancy Bear” (APT28) and “Cozy Bear” (APT29). These groups are known for their sophisticated cyberattacks, which are often state-sponsored. Their operations include espionage, sabotage and data theft, targeting governments, critical infrastructure and businesses worldwide.
- Dark web forums: Russian-language forums such as XSS.is, Exploit.in, RAMP, RuTor and CrdClub are central hubs for cybercrime. These forums provide a platform for the exchange of hacking tools, stolen data and other illegal goods and services. They are known for their strict security measures, the anonymity of their users and the exclusivity of their membership.
- Telegram: This encrypted messaging platform has established itself as the preferred means of communication for cyber criminals. Telegram is used to distribute hacking tools, coordinate attacks and trade stolen information. The platform provides a secure environment that makes it difficult to monitor and prevent criminal activity.
Influence of the Russia-Ukraine war
The war in Ukraine has had a significant impact on the Russian cybercrime ecosystem. The conflict has polarized Russian-speaking threat actors, with some groups supporting the Russian government while others are making financial gain from geopolitical instability. This conflict has led to an increase in hacktivism, ransomware activity and financial scams.
State support
Many Russian cybercriminals and hacker groups have direct or indirect links to the Russian government. These connections allow the groups to access resources and protection from the state. In particular, APT groups such as Sandworm and Turla are known for their links to Russian intelligence services such as the GRU and FSB. These groups carry out complex and coordinated attacks that often pursue Russian strategic interests.
Tactics and methods
Russian hacker groups use a variety of tactics to achieve their goals:
- Phishing and spear phishing: They use deceptive e-mails to try to steal access data or install malware.
- Zero-day exploits: Use of unknown security gaps to penetrate systems undetected.
- Destructive attacks: Use of ransomware and wiper malware to encrypt or delete data and thus cause considerable damage.
- Disinformation and propaganda: spreading false information via social media and other platforms to influence political processes and deepen social divisions.
- Living off the Land: Using legitimate system functions and tools to disguise activities and avoid detection.
Goals and motivation
The goals of Russian hacker groups are diverse and include:
- Political manipulation: influencing elections and political processes in other countries.
- Espionage: Obtaining sensitive information from government agencies, the military and companies.
- Economic sabotage: disruption of economic activities and extortion of companies.
- Disinformation: spreading false information to destabilize societies and political systems.
The motivation behind these attacks ranges from geopolitical interests and economic gain to ideological goals and the promotion of Russia’s national security.
Focus on critical sectors
Russian hacker groups are targeting specific sectors that they regularly attack:
- Energy sector: Attacks on energy infrastructures in order to sabotage or spy on them.
- Media sector: Attacks on media organizations to spread disinformation and manipulate public opinion.
- Government and security sector: Targeted attacks on government agencies and security organizations to gather intelligence and influence policy decisions.
- Telecommunications sector: Attacks on telecommunications companies to disrupt communication networks and intercept information.
Ransomware and politics
Ransomware attacks, long considered purely criminal activities, are increasingly showing signs of political motivation, especially when they originate from Russia. An in-depth investigation has revealed that some of these attacks are not only seeking financial gain, but are also pursuing geopolitical goals in line with the interests of the Russian government. Links to the Russian government: There is growing evidence that some Russian-based ransomware groups have an unofficial but cooperative relationship with the Russian government. These groups enjoy protection from prosecution by Russian authorities, which allows them to continue their operations without fear of arrest. In return, government agencies benefit from the skills of these cybercriminals and use their expertise for their own purposes. One example of this is the leaked internal communication of the Conti ransomware group, which shows that members of this group had contact with government representatives and were occasionally involved in state-supported cyber operations.
One notable observation is the rise in ransomware attacks by Russian groups ahead of elections in major democracies. This temporal correlation suggests that such attacks may be part of a broader strategy to influence elections and destabilize political systems. By disrupting critical infrastructure and fomenting uncertainty, such attacks can undermine public confidence in election results and thus weaken political stability. In addition, it has been noted that companies that have restricted or ceased operations in Russia following the invasion of Ukraine in 2022 have been increasingly targeted by ransomware attacks. This suggests that these attacks are not only motivated by economic motives, but may also serve as retaliation for perceived political or economic hostilities against Russia. The links between ransomware groups and the Russian government, as well as the politically motivated attacks, elevate ransomware above the level of ordinary cybercrime and position it as a serious international security threat. Such attacks not only destabilize the economic structures of the affected countries, but also serve as tools in a broader geopolitical game.
RUSSIA’S APPROACH IN THE CYBERWAR
Practical experience from Ukraine regarding Russian cyberattacks
The practical experience in Ukraine offers important insights into Russian cyber attacks and their impact on the conflict. During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, a variety of cyber and information warfare techniques were used with different objectives and effects. Even if Russia did not achieve many of its cyber and information warfare objectives, lessons can still be learned from the overall picture.
The conflict in Ukraine has many dimensions, one of the most notable being Russia’s use of cyber and information warfare. Russia’s all-out war against Ukraine has resulted in a variety of cyberattacks and information operations that provide invaluable insights into Russia’s capabilities and strategies. Attacks have centered on communications disruption, targeted deception of individuals through networked devices, selective destruction of civilian telecommunications infrastructure, and the integration of kinetic and cyber/information activities.
First phase of the invasion and preparation
Even before the large-scale invasion in February 2022, Russia’s cyber and information forces were well prepared. There was already a significant increase in destructive cyberattacks against Ukraine in January and February 2022. These attacks were aimed at suppressing the communication capabilities of the Ukrainian government and military, indicating long-term, coordinated preparation. A striking example was the attack on the Viasat KA-SAT network shortly before February 24, which was supplemented by conventional and electronic warfare to blind Ukrainian forces.
Transition to less complex attack patterns
Over the course of the war, Russia switched from more complex to simpler attack patterns. These “fast and dirty” methods included distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks and the use of new, less complex and modular “wiper” malware. These changes in attack patterns indicate an adaptation to the needs of a prolonged conflict, where less planning and ease of implementation are required.
Practical lessons from cyber warfare
Experience in Ukraine shows that cyber and information operations are often closely linked to physical events and infrastructure. The dependence of telecommunications on the power grid is a simple example. When an adversary targets the power supply, as Russia did in Ukraine in the fall of 2022, the provision of backup power for telecom sites and data centers becomes a key cybersecurity priority.
Russia has also shown in Ukraine that its information warfare has been strategically designed for decades. Russia is using long-term disinformation campaigns to undermine support for Ukraine and spread false narratives. This poses a significant challenge for Western supporters of Ukraine, as misconceptions about Ukraine and the escalation of the conflict can affect the necessary economic and political support.
Information war and disinformation
Russia’s information war was not only directed against Ukraine, but also against Western countries. Various narratives were used to influence public opinion and undermine support for Ukraine. Examples include the “Winter Is Coming” campaign, which aimed to convince Europeans that they would freeze without Russian energy, and the misrepresentation of President Zelensky as a corrupt leader.
Future prospects and recommendations
The experiences from Ukraine offer important lessons for Western nations that need to prepare for future conflicts. It is recommended to further strengthen cyber defense and respond to threats in a coordinated manner. This includes both technical measures to defend against cyber attacks and resilience against information warfare through targeted communication strategies and the promotion of media literacy.
State hackers at a glance
The most significant international actors include state actors from Russia, China and Iran. These countries use various tactics to promote their geopolitical interests and undermine the stability of European democracies.
In addition to the main actors named below, there are also other countries and non-state actors that attempt to influence elections in Europe. These include, for example, groups acting on behalf of governments or in their own interests to advance certain political agendas. These actors use a variety of methods, including cyberattacks, disinformation, economic pressure and diplomatic maneuvers to achieve their goals. The European Union and its Member States face the challenge of recognizing and countering these threats in order to protect the integrity of their democratic processes.
Russia
Russia is known for its extensive disinformation campaigns and cyberattacks aimed at weakening trust in democratic processes. Some of the best-known examples include influencing the 2016 US elections and attempts to influence the Brexit vote. Russian actors often use social media platforms to spread false information and deepen social divisions.
China
China is increasingly relying on cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns to expand its influence in Europe. Chinese hacker groups are known for conducting industrial espionage and stealing sensitive information that can then be used to influence political decisions. China is also trying to manipulate public opinion in Europe by spreading pro-Chinese narratives in the media.
Iran
Iranian actors also use disinformation campaigns and cyberattacks to pursue their geopolitical goals. These campaigns are often aimed at destabilizing the policies of the US and its allies in Europe. Iranian hacker groups use similar techniques to their Russian and Chinese counterparts.
North Korea
North Korea is another international actor trying to influence elections and political processes worldwide, including in Europe, through cyber activities. While North Korea is less of a focus compared to Russia, China and Iran, there is still significant activity emanating from North Korean actors. North Korea also uses disinformation to further its geopolitical goals and foment political unrest. While there are fewer documented cases of direct election interference by North Korea, the regime still uses cyber operations to exert political pressure and protect its interests, for example by publishing compromising information about political candidates or spreading propaganda.
Outlook: Russian hacker activities
Russian hacker groups are sophisticated and dangerous actors in global cyberspace. Their attacks have far-reaching effects and pose a serious threat to the security and stability of states and companies.
It is critical that organizations worldwide strengthen their cyber security measures and arm themselves against these threats. By analyzing and understanding the tactics and methods of Russian hackers, better protective measures can be developed and resilience against future cyber attacks can be increased.
Our law firm specialises in criminal defence, white-collar crime and IT law / technology law. Note our activity in digital evidence in IT security and software law.
- Liability of Companies in Phishing and CEO Fraud Incidents - 13. May 2025
- Domain Law in Germany - 10. May 2025
- Art Law in Germany - 10. May 2025