Greenwashing, the act of making misleading claims about the environmental benefits of a product, service, or corporate practices, poses significant legal risks for companies operating in the European Union (EU) and Germany. Both regions have stringent laws that prohibit such deceptive practices under competition law, and there are even scenarios where criminal liability may arise. This article outlines the current legal framework, enforcement mechanisms, and recent judicial developments, emphasizing the importance of compliance to avoid severe penalties.
1. Greenwashing under EU and German Law
In the EU and Germany, greenwashing is not just a reputational risk—it’s a legal one. The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) at the EU level and the Act Against Unfair Competition (Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb, UWG) in Germany prohibit misleading environmental claims. Companies must ensure that any claims about sustainability, such as “eco-friendly,” “carbon-neutral,” or “green,” are accurate, substantiated, and not misleading to consumers.
The EU is actively working to tighten regulations around environmental claims. As part of the European Green Deal, the EU Commission has proposed amendments to the UCPD and a new “Green Claims Directive.” These measures aim to strengthen consumer protection against unsubstantiated or false environmental claims by requiring companies to provide clear, accurate, and independently verified information about their products’ environmental impact.
2. Enforcement Mechanisms in Germany
In Germany, the UWG allows for private enforcement of unfair competition laws through cease-and-desist letters (Abmahnungen) from competitors or consumer protection associations. If a company makes unsubstantiated environmental claims, these parties can demand corrective actions and may seek injunctions or damages in court. This mechanism provides a practical and immediate remedy for addressing greenwashing practices, and companies found in violation may face significant fines.
The legal scrutiny of terms like “climate-neutral” has intensified in recent years. Courts have increasingly required companies to clarify whether such neutrality is achieved through emission reductions, offsets, or a combination of both. For instance, the Higher Regional Court (OLG) of Frankfurt ruled that merely stating a product is “climate-neutral” is insufficient unless the company provides detailed information on the measures taken to achieve this neutrality.
3. Examples of Recent Case Law
The German courts have dealt with several cases highlighting the legal risks associated with vague environmental claims:
- Case on Climate-Neutral Claims: In a notable case involving “climate-neutral” trash bags, the OLG Schleswig allowed the use of the term, provided it referred to emissions being either zero or offset. However, it stressed the need for clarity on how the neutrality was achieved, whether through emission reductions or compensations. This case underscores the importance of transparency and the potential for misinterpretation if environmental claims are not adequately substantiated.
- Investment-Related Greenwashing: The German courts have also addressed greenwashing in the investment sector. For example, the labeling of investment funds as environmentally friendly has been subject to rigorous scrutiny. The Regional Court of Stuttgart ruled that vague or unsupported environmental claims in investment advertising could constitute misleading advertising under the UWG, particularly when specific information about the criteria and certification processes behind such claims is lacking.
4. Criminal Liability Risks
Beyond civil liability, greenwashing can lead to criminal consequences, especially in cases involving investors. Misleading environmental claims about products or corporate practices can constitute fraud under German criminal law (§ 263 StGB) if they result in financial damage to investors. This is particularly relevant when companies misrepresent the environmental impact of their operations or products in financial disclosures, potentially triggering investigations for fraud, capital investment fraud (§ 264a StGB), or market manipulation under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG).
Corporate executives and responsible employees can face direct criminal liability if found to have knowingly engaged in or failed to prevent misleading practices. This liability extends to cases where environmental claims are proven to be unsubstantiated, overstated, or deliberately deceptive, making it crucial for companies to ensure robust verification and compliance processes are in place.
5. Upcoming Regulatory Changes
The EU is actively advancing regulatory reforms to combat greenwashing more effectively. The upcoming Green Claims Directive will set clear standards for environmental claims, requiring scientific evidence and third-party verification. Additionally, the directive proposes to prohibit broad, generic claims like “eco-friendly” or “green” unless they are backed by substantial evidence. Companies must stay ahead of these developments to ensure their marketing practices align with the evolving legal landscape.
Conclusion
Greenwashing is a significant legal and reputational risk for companies in the EU and Germany. With the tightening regulatory environment and active enforcement through both civil and criminal channels, businesses must exercise caution in their environmental communications. Ensuring that all claims are truthful, specific, and verifiable is not only a legal requirement but also a critical component of building consumer trust and safeguarding corporate reputation in an increasingly eco-conscious market. As the EU and Germany continue to crack down on misleading environmental claims, companies must adapt swiftly to maintain compliance and avoid costly legal pitfalls.
Our law firm specialises in criminal defence, white-collar crime and IT law / technology law. Note our activity in digital evidence in IT security and software law.
- Protecting Business Secrets in Germany: Legal Risks When Employees Forward Emails to Private Accounts - 6. October 2024
- Law Enforcement’s Access to the TOR Network: Investigative Techniques and Legal Implications - 5. October 2024
- The Challenge of Investigating and Defending Against Cryptomessenger Cases in Germany and Europe - 5. October 2024