Understanding Trademark Law in Germany: Foundations, Modernization, and Practical Insights – in today’s global and highly digitized economy, trademarks are more than just badges of origin. They are strategic communication tools, carriers of reputation, and essential legal instruments to distinguish goods and services in a competitive marketplace. For businesses and legal practitioners outside Germany seeking to understand the country’s approach to trademark law, a closer look reveals a harmonized but uniquely detailed system shaped by European integration, national doctrine, and recent digital challenges.
The Legal Foundation: The German Trademark Act
Trademark protection in Germany is governed by the Markengesetz (Trademark Act), which came into force in 1995 and was most recently amended by the Trademark Law Modernization Act (Markenrechtsmodernisierungsgesetz) in 2019. The Act covers not only traditional trademarks—such as words, logos, or slogans—but also non-traditional forms, including 3D shapes, colors, sounds, and more recently, motion and hologram marks.
Germany recognizes several categories of protected identifiers:
- Trademarks (brands for goods or services)
- Business identifiers (names and signs used in commerce)
- Titles of works (e.g., titles of books, movies, or games)
- Geographical indications (e.g., “Lübecker Marzipan”)
Obtaining Protection: Registration, Use, and Reputation
Trademark protection in Germany can be obtained in three main ways:
- Registration with the German Patent and Trademark Office (DPMA). This is the most secure path and requires that the mark be distinctive, non-descriptive, and not misleading or contrary to public policy. Importantly, as of 2019, graphical representation is no longer required; the new standard focuses on clear and unambiguous representability, making room for modern formats like multimedia marks.
- Acquired distinctiveness through use: If a mark has gained recognition within the relevant market through sustained and substantial use, it may be protected even without registration. This route, however, demands substantial proof of market penetration and can be uncertain.
- Notorious marks: Brands that are internationally well-known—think Coca-Cola or BMW—may benefit from protection under the Paris Convention, regardless of formal registration in Germany.
Substantive Requirements and Absolute Grounds for Refusal
German law imposes several absolute grounds for denying trademark registration, which aim to safeguard public interest and competitive fairness. These include:
- Lack of distinctiveness
- Descriptive or generic terms
- Misleading signs
- Violation of public order or morality
- Protected designations of origin (especially relevant in food, wine, and plant varieties)
The 2019 reform further aligned German law with EU rules, explicitly including traditional specialty names and plant variety denominations among the grounds for refusal.
Trademark Infringement and Enforcement
Trademark holders enjoy exclusive rights to use and defend their marks. Infringement cases commonly arise when there is:
- Identical use for identical goods (identity protection)
- Likelihood of confusion due to similarity of signs and goods
- Dilution or unfair exploitation of a famous mark’s reputation, even across product categories
Legal remedies include injunctions, damage compensation, seizure, and even criminal penalties in severe cases (e.g., in counterfeiting scenarios). The German system is known for its effective interim injunction mechanisms, which are often employed in urgent trademark disputes.
National vs. Union Trademarks
Germany coexists within a European framework. As such, businesses may opt for protection via:
- A national German trademark (effective only in Germany)
- A European Union Trademark (EUTM) (granting protection across all EU Member States)
Each has strategic advantages: a national mark may offer quicker registration and lower costs, while a EUTM offers broader protection with a single application. Litigation strategy often involves both, especially in cross-border conflicts.
Special Issues: Digitalization, NFTs, and the Metaverse
Trademark law in Germany is increasingly grappling with digital realities. Non-fungible tokens (NFTs), digital avatars, and metaverse goods raise complex questions about product similarity and consumer confusion. For instance, whether a virtual sneaker authenticated by an NFT is legally “similar” to a real sneaker depends on various factors like use context, marketing channels, and consumer expectations. While legal practice is still evolving, courts and the DPMA have begun to acknowledge such challenges. Recent cases suggest that analog trademarks might extend to digital uses if the brand’s identity or commercial scope implies such an association.
Criminal Enforcement of Trademark Rights in Germany: A Legal and Strategic Overview
While trademark disputes are commonly associated with civil litigation, the German legal system offers a robust criminal law framework to protect trademark owners against intentional infringements and commercial counterfeiting. This often-overlooked domain—trademark criminal law—has become increasingly significant in recent years due to rising product piracy, evolving digital commerce, and targeted legislative reforms. For businesses and legal professionals outside Germany, understanding this dimension of enforcement is essential, particularly when entering or operating in the EU’s largest economy.
Legal Foundations: The German Trademark Act and Penal Code
Criminal protection of trademarks in Germany is governed by Sections 143 and 143a of the Trademark Act (MarkenG). These provisions criminalize unauthorized and intentional use of protected marks in the course of trade. The scope includes national trademarks, international registrations (IR marks), and European Union Trademarks (EUTMs), with nuanced procedural and substantive rules depending on the type of mark involved.
The basic offense (Section 143(1) MarkenG) covers:
- Identity infringement (identical sign for identical goods),
- Likelihood of confusion (similar sign and/or goods),
- Exploitation of reputation (intentional dilution of a famous mark).
Critically, only intentional acts are criminally punishable, unlike in civil law where negligence can suffice. However, intent may be inferred if the infringer continues to use the mark after a formal cease-and-desist letter.
From Civil to Criminal: Why Pursue Criminal Prosecution?
Trademark owners in Germany predominantly use civil remedies, yet criminal prosecution can offer unique advantages:
- Rapid investigative powers of law enforcement, including searches and seizures.
- Public deterrent effect through prosecution and public judgments.
- Asset confiscation and product destruction, including goods in possession of third parties (via Section 74a StGB and Section 143(5) MarkenG).
- Victim participation via adhesion claims or as a joint plaintiff (Nebenkläger), with rights to influence proceedings and seek damages within the criminal trial.
German law also provides for the public announcement of convictions (§ 143(6) MarkenG), though this is rarely used in practice.
Qualification and Punishment: When Things Get Serious
Standard trademark violations can result in fines or up to three years’ imprisonment. However, Section 143(2) MarkenG introduces a qualified offense, with penalties ranging from three months to five years, when the infringement is:
- Commercially motivated (gewerbsmäßig), aiming at repeated profit-oriented violations, or
- Committed by a criminal group (Bande) specializing in IP offenses.
This elevation reflects a political and prosecutorial effort to combat organized counterfeiting networks and deter repeat infringers.
Procedural Prerequisites: When and How Prosecution Proceeds
In simple cases, prosecution generally requires a formal complaint by the trademark holder (Strafantrag). Without such a complaint, prosecution will proceed only if a special public interest is identified—typically involving prior convictions, substantial damage, or threats to consumer health.
However, in qualified cases (commercial or organized crime), prosecution becomes mandatory. Prosecutors must act ex officio, irrespective of a complaint. This tiered approach balances prosecutorial resources with private enforcement initiatives while ensuring state action in more severe cases.
Strategic Tools for Trademark Holders
Criminal proceedings offer several strategic tools that are either unavailable or harder to obtain through civil litigation:
- Adhesion Procedure (Adhäsionsverfahren): The trademark holder can assert civil claims (e.g., damages, injunctions) directly within the criminal trial. This avoids the cost and complexity of separate civil proceedings.
- Confiscation and destruction of infringing goods, even if held by intermediaries.
- Early seizure measures to prevent dissipation or further sale during the investigation.
- Publicity and deterrence, particularly relevant in high-profile or internet-based cases.
Importantly, the use of expert witnesses—even those from the brand owner’s own organization—is permissible, though subject to judicial discretion to avoid bias.
Practical Realities: Enforcement in E-Commerce and Beyond
German courts and enforcement agencies increasingly focus on online trade and platform-based violations. Even private sellers on platforms like eBay or Etsy may be deemed to act “in the course of trade” if their activity is frequent or profit-oriented. A formal business registration is not required to fall within the law’s scope.
Additionally, parallel imports and unauthorized sales of genuine goods intended for non-EU markets can also constitute criminal trademark violations if no exhaustion of rights has occurred under EU law.
Closing Thoughts: Risks, Remedies, and Responsible Enforcement
German trademark law represents a robust, harmonized but nuanced system. It combines deep doctrinal roots with responsiveness to modern economic realities—from evolving branding strategies to the digital and virtual domains. For international brands and counsel, understanding the distinctions and strategic opportunities of the German approach is not just beneficial—it is essential in today’s interconnected marketplace.
The criminal trademark law offers potent remedies—yet its application remains selective. For foreign rights holders, it provides a supplementary enforcement path especially suited to deliberate, large-scale, or repeat infringements. At the same time, criminal law must not be wielded recklessly. It requires a clear evidentiary basis for intent, proportionality in procedural measures, and respect for the rights of the accused. In an increasingly counterfeit-prone and cross-border world, the criminal defense of trademarks is no longer a theoretical option—it is a strategic reality.
Our law firm specialises in criminal defence, white-collar crime and IT law / technology law. Note our activity in digital evidence in IT security and software law.
- Liability of Companies in Phishing and CEO Fraud Incidents - 13. May 2025
- Domain Law in Germany - 10. May 2025
- Art Law in Germany - 10. May 2025